feed-image RSS Feed

PiperSteele

 
2009.04.11 21:12:45

  Finally an announcement from SGX : They are going to update their site. In all my years of investing nver had I seen such a crappy site as the SGX one - puts even zimbabwe to shame :-).

But here's a recent announcement - yes the beta will be up for all of us to see : www8.sgx.com.

 

 Here's hoping we can obtain a streaming widget to construct cool portfolios. Next stop ETFs from iShares ! CVC are you listning ? 



   SGX | web 2.0 | new site SGX
Comment 1  

2009.04.11 20:49:09


 I just discovered Google's fantastic stock screener - of which I'll just post a snapshot:
 
 
 This is such a cool application - and APIs are provided. So here's hoping that prosperity boys can turn Google APIs into allowing
- screening of stocks with specific critria.
- allowing peer comparisons
- integrating stocks in a portfolio
- showing the effect of such a portfolio on wealth
- tracking wealth with different portfolios.
 
 


   portfolio | google stock screener | value stocks | Google APIs
Comment 0  

Comment 0  

2009.04.10 12:47:07

As opposed to the "picking hot stock category" here's the opposite: picking value stocks. Accordingly what would be a value stock: i.e. a stock whose price is undervalued by the market.

 

  1. The best way of doing this would be to consider a thorough DCF analysis, subtracting market value of debt, the remaining value  divided by the total number of shares outstanding should give the potential share price. Comparing it to current share price should show the upward potential. Of course that would mean correctly predicting terminal value, a task fraught with danger since the closer the cost of capital is to growth higher the terminal value.
  2. The faster way (thanks Larry and Sergei) is to look up at the P/E , P/B ratios, compare it to peers and then take the study on from there.

 

I’ve chosen the Energy and Power sectors to look into – as they provide fundamental value – i.e. value is not created from thin air or banker’s speculation – but through the sale of energy. Price of Kwh sold is known in most jurisdictions and through energy generation sources and O/M costs per Kwh are also widely known. So you have a handle on OPEX, COGS and topline. Remains tax rebates, and different laws in jurisdictions.

 

Power distribution is also synonymous to growth. Higher industrial output means higher demand for power which is in turn dependent on either fossil fuels or renewable sources. If there is an imbalance in the supply demand equation either tariff will rise (in case where electricity prices are non-regulated) or volume of generation will rise through higher efficiency or installation of CAPEX.

So let’s pick some stocks – I followed A Power energy recently. A-Power is a distributed power generation holding. As you know industrial output has shockingly plunged in China – but I believe in one year we’ll probably swing upwards. So now power stocks should be down in China.  

 

 

The recent announcement of A – Pwer’s Q4 earnings beat market expectations by 100% !!! (so much so for analysts)  and their stock surged nearly 30% yesterday ( April 9th) .

This is an extract from the official announcement:

2008 Results

For the full year 2008, A-Power's revenues rose 73.6% to $264.9 million from 2007.

Gross profit increased 79.4% to $36.9 million from 2007. Gross margin was 13.9%, compared with 13.5% in 2007.

G&A expenses were $8.7 million, compared with $3.5 million in 2007. The higher G&A expenses were mainly because of the costs of being a public company and business expansion.

Operating income increased 65% to $28.2 million from 2007.

Net income soared 87.4% to $28.5 million from 2007.

Diluted earnings per share were $1.01, compared with $2.23 in 2007. For the year 2008, the weighted average number of shares on a fully diluted basis was 28.2 million, compared with 6.8 million in 2007.

Balance Sheet Highlights

As of December 31, 2008, A-Power had cash and cash equivalents of $43.5 million, compared with $59.7 million at September 30, 2008.

Working capital as of December 31, 2008 was $97.0 million, compared with $95.8 million at September 30, 2008.

Current ratio as of December 31, 2008 was 3.06 compared with 2.91 at September 30, 2008.

Total shareholders' equity rose to $155.3 million at December 31, 2008, from $143.9 million at September 30, 2008.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded no short-term or long-term bank loans.

So all in all company results look impressive amidst the down turn. So is A-Power a value stock ?

 

 P/E ratio of this china based company show it is undervalued as compared to its peers and  price to book ratios are under 1.

 

  

P/E

P/B

huanneng

14.75

0.051697

A Power

 

6.69

0.945

China Power

-

0.272727

Datang

 

52.28

-

China resource Power holdings

42.09

0.886076

 

 So yes A-Power is a value stock for the following reasons:

  1.   Power generation distribution is closer to buyer ( thus contracts will probably be made with individual buyers in full recognition of buyer’s expected demand profile.
  2. Power generation is geared to match utilization so extra capex in terms of power lines are normally reduced thus increasing operational cash flows.
  3. When industrial demand picks up power stocks will surge accordingly. The beta of a-power (i.e. correlation to the market) is 2.1 meaning that when markets increase by 1 point this stock should on the average surge by 2.1
  4.  A quick calculation shows that 6.69 * 1.01 > current market price. Quick Ratio stood at 3.04 and Debt ratio at 0.2.

 I looked at the average price over a three year period of this stock  - it stood at 9.9USD/share with a volatility of 6 USD/share. So here's my hypothesis ( forward looking); That in two years time the stock will rise to 0.9 USD /share or if an investor would invest at current share price he would get a return of 31%.

 So I put Prosperity's risk planner to the fore and here's the graphic i obtained:

 

 On average I'd make 9900 bucks on 1000 shares, on the upside 16000 USD or mre, and on the downside 2700.So here’s hoping that I got in low and that I can hold on for another two years.



   distributed power generation shares | China | value stocks | risk | power price world
Comment 1  

2009.04.08 13:51:34


The Bear is back but some stocks have surged over the past two trading days - eyes are red with late night tracking. So I've been searching principally for two traits :
  1.  Cash rich companies, debt free companies doing share buy backs with following characteristics 
    • Market Cap / Current assets value < 1; 
    • debt ratio  < 0.5
  2. Potential Acquisition targets of Cash rich companies with following characteristics of 
    • Targets for Pharmaceutical companies
    • Targts for Oil companies
In he first category I found Adeona Pharamaceuticals (AMEX:AEN) some days back with their stock trading at 0.2 USD  and nearly debt free.
 
Bang on baby as they say :
 
 
 A beauty I tell you with 200% increase.
And this is what Reuters had to say : company willing to buy 1 million of stock from time to time for a price of up to 5 USD/share.
Yesterday's volume was : 5.7 million shares ... so need to see how many the company actually bought !
 


   stock picking recession | hot stocks
Comment 0  

2009.04.08 11:10:43


Mortgage rates in singapore practised by some banks ... might be useful for those planning to buy real estate as prices going down and will go further south with plethora of supply coimg out in the market and number of Ang Mos leaving the city state 


   mortgage | singapore | cheapest rate Maybank
Comment 0  

2009.03.09 10:09:02

 
Minister Mentor might be 86 years old - but his life's experiences have held him in good stead - and shows how one of asia's savviest entrepreneurs also knows a thing or two about managing personal finance. An excerpt from the Straits times:


   Personal Finance | Great Depression | Minister-Mentor
Comment 0  

2009.02.24 09:20:49


Apax sells management company stake

By Martin Arnold in London

Published: February 23 2009 18:34 | Last updated: February 23 2009 18:34

Apax Partners, the UK-based private equity group, has sold 7.7 per cent of its management company to Singaporean and Australian investors, helping to establish a permanent capital vehicle to invest in its buy-out funds.

GIC Special Investments, a unit of the Singapore sovereign wealth fund, and Future Fund, the Australian sovereign wealth fund, have agreed to buy shares in Apax from the top partners at the firm, which is still in talks to sell another 2.3 per cent stake.

 

Clipped from the FT- this is the height of stupidity and cronyism. Why would anyone want to buy stake in a management company - i.e. a company that does not have any assets, except a perception that the partners working in such funds have higher skills & knowledge than the Market.

That would mean that APAX consistently outperforms the Market - a fact that was possible only in the heady days of cheap leverage and booming stock markets.  Investing in a  management company, does not bring any capital appreciation, the management company cannot be sold off easily to anothe rone, so I guess this is again a case of rampant cronyism - let me think of the scenario in a posh hotel between GIC special Investmnt team and Apax partners.

 " ... owww isn't this posh" ( apax partner with Brit accent in the Fullerton)

" true it is, really lavish should we order  some lobster " ( GIC)

" sure - that  would be marvellous" ( APAX- after all 1.5% of AuM of more than a billion USD 90% paid for by limited partners can feed these people well)

" ..oh by the way we're feling a bit of a pinch you see" ( APAX)

"Yes, asset prices have fallen, PE multiples are down, NAVs will have to be written down" ( GIC)

" Yes indeed,  this is going to hurt our wallets" ( APAX)

" Hey - I've got a brilliant idea" ( GIC)

" If we buy a stake in your company, I get to show my Management that we're active - and we get our bonus on top of our 500 K salaries, - and you get some extra cash, safer to park it with you braniacs than the singapore stock exchange with all the insider trading going on" (GIC)

"Brilliant  I say ol chap" ( APAX)

cudos - all around, medals are distributed 

 



   GIC | stupidity | Fullerton | medals | APAX | scams
Comment 0  

2009.02.18 14:00:06

The Lehman Mini bond scam Marketing brochure. Please read in fine print that your PRINICPAL IS NOT PROTECTED NOT GUARANTEED ….

 

Wonder if that Singaporean sitting on Apollo heeded my warnings …

 

Humpty dumpty sat on a Wall,

Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.

All GICs horses and all Temasek’s men,

Could not put Humpty together again

 

It is actually incredible that nowhere is Lehman actually mentioned. How senior was this bond, what was the underlying asset requiring financing… ( no banker salary is NOT the correct answer)

 

And look at the credit ratings ….

 

 



   scam | Lehman Mini bond | singapore | humpty dumpty
Comment 1  

2009.01.21 12:07:36


We covered Jurong Technologies in one of our articles  – and the picture was looking rosy albeit tough with all sorts of OEM contracts, ODM forrays but should the CEO have been looking at something simpler - i.e. inventory and receivables management.  The reality of growth through borrowing is hitting hard – as the recession monster starts gobbling its prey, this was reported in the straits times:

“ Electronics manufacturer Jurong Technologies has been given three weeks to repay millions of dollars to OCBC Bank or face possible winding up proceedings.  Jurong Tech told the Singapore Exchange (SGX) that the sums involved were S$22 million and US$23 million. The company asked for its stock to be suspended pending this announcement.”

The stock plummeted 93 % in one year. I say this is teruk sekali  especially for the more than 2,400 people itemploys. 

 At Q3 2008, the company owes a whopping 367 million SGD in short term liabilities. Current Assets amount to 394 million SGD of which Inventories amounted to 45% and trade receivables around 45% as well.... so simple finance speak would be sell the inventory get the buyers to pay you .... but therein lies difference between financiers and business men ;

World demand in major buyer countries for products manufactured by Jurong have fallen drastically and even with falling prices people are holding back on their cash . And Jurong’s customers are also seeing a major shift in demand.

Schematically you can see this as a bull whip effect. Let’s all hope that 2400 jobs are not lost. At least these buggers are not bankers who screw around – they just needed abit more investment in a better inventory and accounts receivable software and management. 

 There's a whole lot of companies out there - and this tiny jewel was actually PBT positive.

 



   Jurong Technologies | bankruptcy | Singapore Recession | Jobs lost
Comment 0  

2009.01.05 11:04:11


During the Christmas break, I spent some time reading ... and one of the articles that struck me was entitles "What's Wrong with Silicon Valley" in the Business Week, January 12th edition.

 

We all know that venture capital has been fundamental to the enormous rise in wealth during the 1990 and even the 2000s despite the market correction of 2001 and there are some points in the article that I'd like to debate out.

 

Central to the article was that Venture firms were shying away from the risky bets that were made before the 1990s. An interview with Andy Grove a semiconductor specialist who advanced the cause of Intel as CEO and chairman and saved the US chip industry from Japanese Industrial dominance was remarkable in its insights in what ails the industry - 

1.     Short-sightedness of the current pack of Venture Capital industry  

2.     Propensity to satisfy investor returns by working towards exit strategies

It is funny how Venture Capital Industry has "stopped" taking risky bets - in truth this can be partially blamed on the bursting of the technology bubble in 2001 leading to venture capitalists around the world to tread more cautiously in their investments but the fundamental reasons are to be found elsewhere.

 

In the 70's and 80's the world was not uni-polar. The US competed with the USSR on several fronts but principally on defence and space. The former was more a matter of survival while the latter was more of prestige value, with huge amount of government budget allocated to both fields. This meant money for two fields which were paramount in the overall defence strategy of the US - Information and Communication.  This led to notable breakthroughs in applied sciences and engineering. The principal sponsor and market for these technologies was the government and the defence/space industry. Thus the cash lifeline was not the "market" as we might like to think but national interests. The entrepreneurs and financiers came from a closely knit network built around the defence industry where to succeed one needed:

1.      Bright engineers

2.     Trust

3.     Cheap source of finance

And at that time all three were present within the defence and space industries. (The trust factor came from peer pressure which is fundamental to the behaviour in the armed forces)

 

Zoom out to 1990's. The world had largely become uni-polar and as the US didn't need to compete anymore with the now defunct USSR - defence and space budgets as a percentage of GDP actually decreased which had the following implications

1.     Engineering as a well paid profession where engineers could work on cutting edge technology started changing. Instead engineering was seen primarily as a "cost centre" and not an investment leading to outsourcing to cheaper sources thus slowly putting into motion the "death spiral trap" of engineering. Lesser innovation weans away demand for engineers and higher risk in the job for lesser pay makes engineering an even lesser incentive for bright students to take up as a career path.

2.     Breakdown of trust based networks. Now that "business" in terms of off taking of products or services could not be  guaranteed by the military/space - firms had to actually start "selling" and for that "creating markets". This meant creating new networks which could eventually become sales avenues - but his meant "building trust through suspicion" a costly process where negotiation skills become more and more important - this eventually saw the rise of the "sales" CEOs or "consulting" CEOs i.e. CEOs who did not have engineering backgrounds but came from sales or consulting backgrounds as these backgrounds pre supposed that the individuals could get in deals faster through the trust they had built with past clients.

3.     Financing source became typically expensive as the resource necessary to create products was harder to obtain, and the market for the products needed to be created - thus moving VCs to demand typically hurdle rates of 25%.

Thus what we see today as start ups are typical of the consequences of lesser government spending as a percentage of GDP on defence and space industries namely:

1.     Since good engineering is a "rare" resource - most start ups today are "efficiency players" - i.e. there is very little engineering innovation in Web x.0 compared to the innovations which went into creating transistors or integrated circuits. It is easier to create a community based application than a micro chip as the barrier to resources is much lower - (indeed founders of digg and Facebook are University drop outs which of course does not imply that they cannot innovate or understand the nature of innovations but most innovations they will bring will be limited to mathematical optimization in search patterns). 

2.     Since engineering costs are low due to the non complexity of products and services, VCs are also not willing to pay top dollars for these resources. VCs being typically humans act in herd mentality and many of them have vaunted MBAs where the notion of ROIC (Return on Invested Capital) is "fundamental" to value creation. This has terrible implications for innovation which in itself is a long process (think of the time it took from the p-n junction to the integrated circuit). VCs thus are drawn to "low cost" start ups (read resource light in assets as well as engineering skills) with higher than ordinary returns in the shortest possible time. This is the nonsensical finance equation which today has precedence over a beautiful navier-stokes or a tunnel effect equation.  

3.      "The shortest possible time" in VC speak is typically three to five years which means that a market needs to exist or be created for the VCs to make their returns. This of course led to the 2001 dot com bubble burst where VCs and Investment bankers colluded to synthetically create a market by passing the risk to "non sophisticated" investors - ( I would say more gullible as VCs are not sophisticated). Earlier VCs could "measure" return by counting the dollars that defence/space was willing to spend and through careful pruning dividends that could be distributed after years of operations. 

 So is VC and entrepreneuship doomed and how to get "creative destruction" right ?

 

  1.  We need a big big dream - not of making money, but of a higher cause which will progress mankind, someone to state  that dream loud and clear and goverment to push money to realise that dream. 
  2. If the dream is stated and money is on the table, a competetive process needs to be put in place so that the best "brains" bid for the realization of the elements that will make up the dream. The "best brains" will hire best of class - because "brainy" people often despise being surrounded by mediocre types - and this will lead to higher awareness and participation in the exact and applied sciences. Too many science students are lured by the big bucks offered by investment banks - making money out of money has limits ( read credit crunch). 
  3. VCs will be pruned out. Only the "grand cru" will survive. As money from the government spills in entrepreneurs will go for cheaper source of financing. since Vcs are human they'll want to be part of the big " show and tell" - but will have lesser bargaining power reflected in lower hurdle rates. The ones which will be able to survive on lower hurdle rates are those which have longer relations with limited partners and longer and more realistic track records as well as better networks to benefit the entrepreneurs. After all - isn't capitalism's first tenet - "The fittest survive"

 

 



   venture capital | creative destruction
Comment 1  

2008.10.27 09:14:49

Personal Finance Monitor: Insights into How Vietnamese Consumers Manage their Finance

Visa International, the world’s leading provider of payment card systems and  ACNielsen the global leader in market research, announced the findings of their first Vietnam Personal Finance Monitor (PFM). The PFM is Vietnam’s leading report into the state of the money habits of people in Vietnam.

Sampling an audience of social-economic classes A,B & C and some of the key findings of the report include:

  • Very low bank account penetration, with only 50% of Hanoi and 31% of Ho Chi Minh City residents in SECs ABC having bank accounts.
  • 21% awareness of credit cards, 8% of debit cards, 91% awareness of ATM cards. Visa is seen as the leading brand of payment cards.
  • Very low penetration of lending from banks, with the most borrowing from families and friends.
  • Gold and foreign currency is seen as the “safest” investment for Vietnamese.

“It is interesting to view the results the PFM has brought us and it will be fascinating to watch the way in which this changes as Vietnam develops,” said Stuart Tomlinson, Visa Country Manager for Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos.  “The findings point to a lot of work that needs to be done in educating the public of Vietnam in terms of their management of personal finances, their use and trust of an increasingly banked economy and their attitudes toward payment with cards and personal credit.”

“Indeed, it still seems that a majority of people in the higher social-economic classes, who in other countries would be relying on banks, simply do not yet see a need to keep their money to bank accounts, interestingly citing a lack of security as a prime reason for this reluctance,” said Mr. Tomlinson.  “Further feedback from our research indicates a belief that the account opening procedures and banking operations in general are complicated and time consuming, and this also deters uptake.”

“58% of respondents indicated that they simply do not have enough money to need a bank account. This is an interesting finding considering this survey was taken among wealthier, asset holding Vietnamese.”

“Generally speaking, people will open current accounts or savings accounts before broadening their banking needs and payment cards follow this,” Mr. Tomlinson continued. “So the relatively low knowledge of payment cards is a logical follow-on from the low acceptance of banking products.”  

“However there are some extremely positive signs in this data.  The very high ATM card awareness is a step in the right direction toward getting Vietnamese people to pay with cards and to associate cards with payment.  And of course, seeing Visa prevail as the best known of the payment card providers is certainly very gratifying,” he said.

“With Visa emerging as the best known of the payment card companies in Vietnam, they were the perfect for ACNeilsen to partner with,” said Mr. Chris Morley, Managing Director of ACNeilsen Vietnam.  “We have undertaken Vietnam’s pre-eminent exploration of personal finance habits and the findings will be a very valuable tool for Vietnamese banks seeking to better understand their customers’ motivations, preferences and future requirements when it comes to savings, investments, payment cards, lending and borrowing.”

According to the report, borrowing from banks is not yet a common practice in Vietnam, with only two percent surveyed of customers having borrowed from a financial institution, preferring instead to borrow from friends and family.

“A customer perception that it is very complicated and time consuming to borrow from a bank prevails in Vietnam, as well as a belief that interest rates charged by the banks are restrictive, so people prefer to save up for major purchases and pay in cash, or otherwise borrow from friends or family to avoid interest repayments, asset declaration or red tape from the financial sector,” said Mr. Tomlinson.

“Some interesting differences between Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoian personal finance trends were revealed,” said Mr. Tomlinson. “Residents of HCMC seem to borrow more to finance business activities, while Hanoi residents tend to borrow for home improvements as general consumption spending.”

This is the first such study into personal finance and was done with a 2,000 person sample from AB and C socio-economic classes. These classes are defined by housing ownership and asset ownership. The first was carried out from 15 to 30 September 2006 with 1,000 sampled face-to-face and door-to-door in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. The interview is applied to randomly pick a qualified respondent in a household with average length about 60 minutes. The next such study will be completed mid 2007.



   Personal Finance | Vietnam | Visa
Comment 0  

2008.10.10 17:03:18


 Jim rogers - makes a point on the bull run of the commodity markets signals that even oil if its falls temporarily (one of my fellow bloggers seems to believe this will fall below USD 80 by the year end) it still has a long bull run ahead of it! Also he completely demolishes ol friend Ben's appetite to keep printing money which of course will devalue the dollar. If costs of major suppliers of commodities ae in currencies which strenghten as oposed to the dollar whereas sales/revenues are in dollar terms for these suppliers then for sure commodity price will rise.


  
Comment 4  

2008.10.10 11:40:38

nice video explaining money Creation



   money | debt | thieves | bankers
Comment 0  

2008.09.19 11:02:32

Short-sellers find themselves in dock

"Published: September 18 2008 19:14 | Last updated: September 18 2008 19:14

Banking stocks have been taking a hammering over the past week – some so severely that time for other solutions ran out: Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy; Merrill Lynch and Halifax Bank of Scotland are being taken over. Amid such turmoil, short-sellers are being singled out for blame – and now regulators are taking action to curb them.



Read more...

   Regulators | Short Selling
Comment 0  

2008.09.15 17:12:11

Bets are on that AIG is the next, with massive amount of short selling reported .. the honchos at AIG have been parading in front of the NYSE and SEC.

But given the liquidity crisis of AIG I think they are the next on the choping block.

 



  
Comment 1  

2008.09.15 16:28:07

In December, Temasek invested 4.4 billion US$ in Mother Merill at 48 US$ a share. At the moment Temasek was pretty bullish about Merill's long term prospects:

"Merrill is a leading global financial institution, with strong franchises in wealth management, global markets and investment banking. We believe it has an excellent platform with strong growth potential under John's leadership," reported Manish Kejriwal, Temasek's senior managing director of investments.

Mr Kejriwal, who in the mean time must have earned a nice plush salary must be sweating in front of his task masters as Merill is going to be acquired for 29 US$ a share. This would amount to almost 1.7 billion US$ loss for Temasek assuming that Temasek has held on to its shares.

This provides fodder to legislators who are asking for more transparency in the way sovereign funds are run. It has already been reported that Temasek was one of the worst performing government investment agencies. This only goes to show why:

  1. Poor Research and Non objectivity
  2. Remuneration not linked to actual long term value creation

What is funny is that the list does not stop here. I'll be pointing out a list of investments which make no sense in my next blog. In the meantime here's a few valauble lessons:

  1. Investment Managers straight out of Investment Banking or MBA have noc lue where value lies because they have not build anything themselves - and just fooling around with excel spreadheets will not solve that
  2. Investing in Resumes is straightforward - investing in people is not

 

 

 



  
Comment 0  


Prosperitypersonal in the Press

Money Mind

"Do give it a whirl, I had loads of fun graphing my own finances."


 

Money News